Monday, December 30, 2013

Modi or Rahul?

Few days back, around afternoon, I was relaxing in balcony on a winter Sunday while reading newspaper (I generally say I was taking Vitamin D :D), I was struck with a question from my wife, "Modi ya Rahul?". I glanced at her then again sunk back quietly. "लगता नहीं कि तुमने अपना मन बना लिया है, अभी भी confusion में हो?"  she asked again. I said, "कुछ picture तो बनी है दिमाग में , फैसला भी है… देखते है ". Soon, me appearing in a trance while reading, threw a challenge to me, "अच्छा तो फिर दोनों के +ve और -ve points बताओ & how would you explain it in simple terms to one who has just crossed 18?".  
I looked at the sky for a second, asking god, "अभी तो paper का  पहला page ही पढ़ना चालू  किया  है , इतनी  जल्दी ?". I finally agreed to give it a thought. Since I love to make analogies with real life scenarios(and funnier) to understand better, as the confusing and almost similar manifestos of both parties are harder to digest, I tried my way in answering to her.

Assume that we are at a bus stand. There are many to choose from(each has its own party symbol) but there are two buses at short distance to us, one is saffron(BJP) in color and the other has a "face palm" (congress) on it. They both are in ideal position with their engines roaring (like the 'Nagar seva' of Indore :)) and the conductors are shouting their hearts out to call us for a ride and both are promising to get us to 'a' destination.When we enter each one of them, what do we see ...
 
Try to visualize...we move towards the BJP bus first... a decently old bus which looks like has just got servicing done and some broken glass windows at the back and its conductor(Rajnath Singh), who was shouting at the door hanging half of his body outwards and beating sh$# out of the glass window with the Rs.5 coin, "हा भियो, ...टेसन टेसन टेसन ....चलो भिया चलो, अपने NaMo भिया कि गाडी है...टेसन टेसन टेसन". I said, "भियो, direct टेसन चलोगे न… घुमा के तो नि ले जाओगे "". "अरे तुम बैठो तो भिया, क्या यही पूरी पत्री छपवाओगे",  he said. We entered and talked to the driver and had a quick look at the others inside the bus. The bus driver's name is Modi. He seems to know where all of us want to go and is animatedly assuring us of taking all of us to the destination but his way is little different. His sleeves are folded up, two top buttons like Tapori Anil Kapoor are open, his rustic face and local slang which he throws while telling about the tales of his numerous days he spent in driving shows his knowledge of route, confidence and experience in driving this bus. Midway, I started feeling un-comfortable about my pick, I felt that bus was waiting earlier for too long and it is stopping on the non-designated bus stops too frequently and not going with the speed which we had expected. On argument with helpers & conductors, we are told very rudely not to ask questions or suggest anything, "driver knows it all and will go according to his will (ज़यादा  ग्यान  बाटने  की ज़रूरत नी है )". Unless the bus is overly occupied, bus will be stopped at all possible bus stops. We are denied of any freedom of speaking, moving inside bus, could be asked to vacate seats at any point of time or could be un-boarded without any ticket refund. There are some people at the back seat making their presence terrifying because of way they are shouting in drivers praise and don't give a damn with what the passengers might be going through. His helpers are wielding weapons without fear in bus although assuring us they will get us to our destination without any trouble or worry. Although I paid for a seat, and the iron seats had a nice appearing cushion with leather cover but, what the hell, actually there is no cushion but just cover that too of ragazine! If this was not too much, then intermittently I had to vacate seat for the driver-helpers, saying, "don't be bothered by standing for few minutes...you will get to where you want to and ..(if he wants to!)". There is an elderly-looking lady sitting right besides driver(Sushma) smiling at us and assuring not to be worried of whenever driver jumps red-light or hits another vehicle on road. I checked this travel company's rating on Google, it would be around 3 out of 5 with mixed feedback.Being inside it, gave a strange combination of feelings, fear of losing independence along with sense of assurance of reaching where I want to.

"Hmmm, now, how would you describe that bus with face-palm sign?", I was asked. Looking at the Congress' bus, which is very old, definitely needs a lot of overhauling but was recently painted in a bid to look good, but alas, the horrible engine noise and signs of its parts getting worn out gives highly contradicting image. There are helpers who are tightening screws here and there to keep this bus running. Looking at all this, I gather some strength to take a chance to have a ride and step into it. Conductor(Digvijay & few others interchangeably) is unconvincing and no better than BJP's bus. We got a glimpse at the window panes, shocked to see that most of them are either not there or broken by stone pelting at the bus. I inquire about it from fellow passengers in the queue and they said the bus' helpers either steal them or people in the route throw stones at this bus b'coz they are angry with the noise it creates!

We get into the bus but there is no driver! Conductor said, 'Sir is coming in his BMW", I was awestruck at his answer & the look he gave to me like, I was supposed to know this. After 2 hours of waiting, I saw few BMWs coming towards the bus, meanwhile a lot of passengers had already left the bus but I was still trying to be hopeful. A clean shaven, nice looking guy in a suit came out of a BMW, waived hands at us first and then steps into our bus. I felt like telling this guy not to board this bus b'coz its just a cheating going on, but OMG! He waived at us again in the bus and then helpers rolled out a red carpet in the aisle to the driver's seat and sprinkled flowers on it. He walks on it and before turning to driving seat he says to us, "I don't know where do you all want to go, but we will try to figure out together"! I have no idea what's happening there.

He sat on the driving seat but, while trying to sneak a peek I found, one guy holding the steering wheel, one takes care of gear and another one of the brakes and accelerator. After gaining some strength, I dared to ask, "भियो, अपन चल कहा रिये है.। ticket तो हमने टेसन का लिया है, वही ले जाओगे  न सीधे-सीधे , सही सलामत पंहुचा दोगे ?". He laughed first and then said "don't worry, we will go everywhere where the road is(does not matter where you want to go) and till we have diesel with a great Escape velocity". Then a lawyer looking, grey haired man ran towards me asking to shut up and sit down quietly."Today is baba's first day at this, don't dare to make it complex or you will loose all your privileges", he said to me. "First day? For what?", I asked."Driving a bus, you idiot common man of banana country. Baba will go where he want to, rest assured you will have zero loss", he replied! I felt like putting a bullet in my head(or his head) at that time, then looked at the options of getting on to any other bus, but, damn it, this was the only last one! Other passengers said, this guy does not know driving, he does it everyday, he will only give instructions and if he finds some interest then he might try his hand on steering wheel today for the first time. Although we paid for ticket when we were in queue before boarding, but had to pay again in the bus thrice, whenever a lungi dance doing conductor passed through the aisle. The seats did not have any sign of cushions! WTF!! Restrictions here were same as in other saffron colored bus but I could talk to other passengers, rest all was same circus!

"Are these the only options?", she asked. "For now, yes, AAP is far behind to come with a good count in parliament, I think, although Delhi has been won. They will be वोट -कटुआ for both parties at that time :)", I replied. 
Looking at the options again, the former does give me a sense of belief that the driver knows where passengers want to go; has experience in taking them there; may not be giving too much freedom or comfort to the passengers and will support his helpers in whatever they do. He needs passengers to fuel the bus but where the bus will go, passengers will not have any say once done! We may loose your freedom, rights, may be bullied in-between and still hope that we will get there. Everything is shiny but they all seem hollow and you can't touch them. There is a sign of light at the end of the tunnel.

The picture is not quite green in the later case too. A driver only playing NFS till now is thinking of riding this about-to-die bus without even touching it. The staff's eyes tell the truth of him as a holy burden but are rock solid fan of this old bus. We will be bullied by the helpers with no hope of relief from anywhere. Where will the bus go, is completely uncertain of because it is for fun of Baba not for passengers(us). The money collected as ticket to give basic facilities would end up in the fuel for BMW he takes to ferry between his home and bus stand. He might crash it into a valley or kill thousands on road and rest assured that no police will come to rescue. Forget the sign of light, driver does not even know how does a tunnel look like!

She was convinced with the scenario I portrayed and enjoyed the story, and has mostly made up her mind too... I know too whom I have to vote for if these are the only choices but I wish the picture could be different this time at least. 

This was an attempt to picture both of them in a different manner which I hope have been able to create.

ऱाजीव  शर्मा

13 comments:

  1. Amazing piece. And I am privileged to post the first comment on your first blog. :)

    Your dilemma is upfront and I will try to make you feel satisfied, if not resolve your dilemma. I disagree on following part of your story:
    ...the former does give me a sense of belief that the driver knows where passengers want to go; has experience in taking them there; "may not be giving too much freedom or comfort to the passengers and will support his helpers in whatever they do. He needs passengers to fuel the bus but where the bus will go, passengers will not have any say once done! We may loose your freedom, rights, may be bullied in-between and still hope that we will get there."

    The examples they have set by ruling MP/CG/Gujarat/Goa/Bihar(In coalition) and the only 5-yr tenure in centre; where in Vajpayee was PM, I was never terrified of them.... The fear is baseless.., is all I would say..

    I want to listen more on this probably...

    ReplyDelete
  2. This review is of Modi's governance, there is no lokayukta in Gujarat, press does not have too much of freedom there, not a lot of reviews of policies in Gujarat has been done which enhances this thought of no reviews under Modi...sure MP/CG/Goa are examples but they are not under Modi! Then there is Amit shah and others who would ensure you don't go out of line :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. On "not a lot of review of policies in Gujarat has been done": Reviews might have been done, but you might not have found them on news; reason being, a negative news brings more TRP. If there is one news article which talks about a hundred things going above average in Gujarat, and another article which flashes one stuff going wrong, you will pick the latter and ignore the former; If readers are biased to to read negative news, why wont news channels serve the recipe of their taste.

    Further, I don't believe that Gujarat is a black box; and what is going on inside is hidden from rest of India. It's not a separate country which could govern everything from its inside. The boundaries are porous, and groups, corporates, press, and most importantly people do flow out and in of Gujarat. I have not found one exceptional Gujju who would complain that freedom is compromised in Gujarat... . The reports of lack of freedom are exaggerated. Modi, have my words, is India's best bet as on today.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good one Rajeev.. I enjoyed it and visualized every thing while reading :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Then why not there was any Lokayukta untill now in Gujarat and even if one was appointed, that was after so much hullabaloo...Some of his policies are now being criticized too now by other agencies....Amit shah like people who are charged to more serious crimes are virtually taking care of home department...no views being sought from the local communities or public for lot of policies...environment and natural resources are big problem for us today but if Modi would keep favouring corporates blindly on it the natural beauty will be compromised...you can't keep giving farm lands to Maruti & others although they generate revenue but it must be noted that people need food too at the end of day and if farm lands are being given just like that..we are looking at inflation going north from now on... he is not absolutely a gold coin for India...there will be lot of side effects of this pill for current political illness in country...but I do agree out of the 'current available options' for parliamentary elections he is one preferred candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1. Amit Shah like people (Or people like Amit Shah):
    Sir, if you have a team of 10 guys, 1 WILL turn out to be a laggard, you CANNOT have all aces in your cards. They have ruled for 15 odd years, and you are naming 1 guy who turned out to be indulged in unhealthy practices. I would say this itself is an achievement. You wait for AAP to rule for 5 yrs, and the lose links will start to appear. One man CANNOT control the conscience of a hundred. Greed is an inseparable character of human, and whoever says, he has never been touched by it, is a terrible liar. People become saints to practice austerity... The greed doesn't allow even them to remain exception and catches them too ( recall ramdeo, asaram or nirmal). If even the so called saints are not exempted from greed, how could humans be. Where I am coming to, is, wait for 5 years, and I bet even you believe that at least one man in team AAP will be caught getting indulged into greed for money or power or woman or crime. Forget 5 years, Kejriwal had to bring down nomination of some of its candidates after fingers were pointed to them. (http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-10-15/news/43068643_1_aap-kejriwal-aam-aadmi-party)..

    Man, if you are looking for idealism, you can find it in history books of Rajputana.., not in newspapers of today.

    2. Concern of diminishing agricultural land
    I have three reads for you:

    i. Gujarat’s Noteworthy Reforms in Public Distribution System!
    http://www.narendramodi.in/gujarats-noteworthy-reforms-in-public-distribution-system/

    ii. Green Gujarat leading agriculture
    http://www.slideshare.net/www.narendramodi.in/green-gujarat-leading-agriculture

    iii. Secret of Gujarat’s Agrarian Miracle after 2000
    http://www.gujaratcmfellowship.org/document/Agriculture/Secret%20of%20Gujarat%20Agrarian%20Miracle_EPW_26Dec09.pdf

    and this report: http://www.gujaratcmfellowship.org/document/Agriculture/Agriculture%20Performance%20in%20Gujarat%20since%202000_IWMI%20&%20IFPRI%20Report-_May%202009.pdf

    The per capita crop production is way too higher for Gujarat comparing other Indian states.

    All of these are not sponsored reports; (I personally know one of the authors of the last report).


    During my MBA, I got the opportunity to visit IRMA (Institute of Rural mgmt, Anand) located in Anand, Gujarat for a case study competition. I was astonished by the intense harmony of these MBA students of IRMA with the rural locals. And, to your surprise, govt. of Gujarat has directly made job offers to some of its students. IRMA is an esteemed MBA institute; probably the best in country for its rural management programmes.
    Govts. of no state in India recruits MBAs, forget 'Rural MBAs'.
    But, this will not make news. Positive news for a state whose positive news are common. Why will anyone read it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. hmm...interesting...but I am still concerned of the CAG and Lokpal like authorities and their reach under his governance. Amit shah is The famous case with Narendra modi and the fact that one rat has been on the top even after so many complaints and outcry by people..there should be some more responsibility on his side..he must have removed him from the positions if fingers were pointed onto him and if people seek such a high stature from him. There is no will to remove him and being deaf ears does not help building a credible image. I disagree with the argument that there is just 1 like him there so its fine, even if there is one he must have been removed! As you mentioned about Kejriwal, he did fire the ones who were indicted..so I expect at least that much honesty. I can't believe that there has not been any misadventure done by his government or officials under his governance in Gujarat...when no agencies are there obviously no news will be made out of it. These audit agencies and law enforcement must be free from clutches.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kejriwal had no option to remove the tainted candidates; but, the more gruesome fact is, why people had to point it out. A person, who has acted shrewder than CBI when it came to uncovering corrupted politicians of Congress; was he not capable of himself doing the background check of his tainted candidates. When the allegations on candidates are so prominent, that even a common man knows it, how was the Sherlock Holmes unaware of them.

    Further, like any corporate firm, the parties have their own Unique Selling Proposition to offer the customers (voters). Modi is banging on Development as its primary offering, while AAP primarily offers Clean governance. For both of these parties, the vice versa propositions are secondary. Thus, if AAP goes with fielding tainted candidate, it nullifies its own proposition. For Modi, removing a tainted candidate is not priority, as he is selling 'development'.

    That was first reason, why AK had to remove the tainted candidate. Second, and more important: dude, it is their launching function. Whenever a businessman launches its business, he offers great service, flawless products, even at the cost of his profit. For 90% businesses, the first year is an year of losses; How can he catch eyes of customers who have all their lives gone to other shops! So, this step was as obvious as offering free water in Delhi. There is nothing outstandingly commendable about it.

    And news agencies, as I said earlier also, Gujarat is a state, not a country. It cannot try to curb the media. If Gujarat govt., can bribe and buy all of the more than 500 news agencies of the entire country, Congress has more money to bribe and buy them back to expose Gujarat govt. Even a single negative anti-govt. report is worth more than the revenue of an entire year for a lot of small agencies. I have never seen a single Gujarati complaining about freedom of press in Gujarat. Strange! People are free; but news agency is telling them they are not free. Big problem, eh !

    And, if all those 500+ news agencies (including the ones headquartered outside Gujarat) can be bribed to hide all anti-Gujarat reports, why can't just 5 of them be bribed to publish those reports which you have read which say that Gujarat bribes all 500 agencies?

    Plain logic. Isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  10. naah....what kejriwal 'had to do' does not justify keeping Amit shah as a top aide still...also its not the media agencies I had talked about...I don't believe much on them anyways coz they are already being financed by one party or other..its about Govt. independent audit agencies and policy making agencies. Good amount is green not all is well it seems...I wonder why all reviews about his policies have come out to be good and there is no news of any positive/negative criticism of his some implemented policies...it is not possible that everything was bang on target and gold! Here is one latest report
    http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-12-30/india/45708452_1_programme-chiranjeevi-yojana-delivery

    ReplyDelete
  11. what kejriwal 'had to do' does not justify keeping Amit shah as a top aide still.. but both these acts are similar acts: Nominating a tainted candidate (don't give me that AK was unaware of the taints) and keeping Amit in top brass.

    This way, both are not clean. Right?

    ReplyDelete
  12. No, I don't think so...Ak's team did a lot of background check and did remove some of the nominated candidates by themselves..even if someone was nominated, they had backtracked and either not supported them or removed them pre-poll. The fact is they acted on the reports but the latter did not! That is a clear distinction between two..I don't support AK too much blindly too but if both of them are compared at least Modi for sure can not score point on this one :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Agreed. Completely on this. In terms of cleanliness, AK scores higher. But, considering all aspects, I would still vote for Modi... given the experience, past record of innovation in governance, of course playing very supportive role in development of the state. As they say, beating everyone and coming on top is difficult, but what really tests your nerves, is being there for long. Proving to be good enough to be elected for 15 years, gives me some confidence in him...

    ReplyDelete